Tuesday, 5 November 2019

United States bids adieu to the Paris Climate Agreement

Adieu
Friend,

Adieu, adios, addio, tschuss, sayonara, goodbye.

Hopefully not, "see you later."

On Monday the United States formally notified the United Nations that it is withdrawing from the ill-conceived Paris climate agreement.  

CFACT is the preeminent organization reporting on international climate diplomacy from a freedom perspective.  We've been reporting on this every step of the way.  We were at Kyoto, Paris, Copenhagen and all the rest.  We're headed to Spain in December.

It will take a year to get out of Paris.  Multiple presidential candidates have announced their intention to quickly jump right back in if elected.

The U.S. Constitution requires Senate ratification of treaties.  The U.S. did not ratify the prior Kyoto Protocol.  The Paris document was styled as an "agreement" rather than a treaty by making key provisions, such as emissions targets, nonbinding.  This was designed to enable President Obama to sign it without submitting it to the Senate. 

Binding or not, the Paris Agreement is riddled with defects.  Getting out is the right move.

The Paris Agreement would barely impact global temperature, even assuming that the most extreme climate computer models are correct, which they never have been.

It would cost a staggering fortune, potentially hundreds of trillions of dollars, while achieving next to nothing, even under its own assumptions.

It would empower a vast, international climate bureaucracy that does not value individual freedom, would undermine national sovereignty, and would redistribute vast sums to dictators and kleptocracrats around the world. 

The Paris Agreement places all the pressure on the United States, Europe and the developed world, while giving China, India, Brazil and other tremendous CO2 emitters a pass.  China and India are building new coal plants and industrial capacity as fast as their economies will allow.

The main impact of the agreement is to shift manufacturing from American and the West to China and the East with the added environmental "benefit" of shipping goods across oceans on diesel-powered container ships. 

America and other countries are buying vast quantities of intermittent, inefficient wind turbines and solar panels that are unable to provide the power we require.  China has used predatory trade practices to ensure that if we insist on making this mistake, we buy the wind and solar from them. 

The Paris Agreement will not meaningfully alter the temperature of the world, but it would redistribute money and power, not to our benefit.

President Trump was correct to pull us out.  We should stay out.

For nature and people too,
 
Craig Rucker
President

Thursday, 31 October 2019

Chile cancels UN climate conference COP25.

Mass protests in Chile because of rising energy costs are a result of subsidies given to renewables to promote man made climate policies.  Clearly the public will not have it.  The same is happening in Lebanon and with the yellow vests in France and in other countries across the world.

Saturday, 26 October 2019

Coal capacity in India growing! Independent gets it wrong!

A recent article in the Independent by Ian Johnston highlights a growth in solar energy.  Analyst Tim Buckley in the Institute for Energy Economics mentions this.   however the Indian government paints a totally different picture of increasing coal capacity for the next three years.
G Prasad chief engineer at the Indian Federal Power ministry said
    Solar power definitely has a role to play, but as Mr Prasad noted in the article above:
“If we have to meet demand and address the intermittencies we have with solar and wind, we have no choice but to keep depending on coal-based generation in the near future.”
India Expects coal capacity to swell by a fifth in three years to 238GW!
 https://www.energylivenews.com/2019/08/05/india-expects-coal-capacity-to-swell-by-a-fifth-in-three-years/    The independent have got it wrong!
    acknowledgement to Paul Homewood blog

Consequences of climate policies. Chile explodes in violence

If it can happen in Santiago, it could happen anywhere. That is the uncomfortable message that the rest of the world should take from the sudden breakdown of civil order in Chile, and unfortunately it is correct… The catalyst was a proposal to raise public transport fares and energy bills. There is ample evidence from across the world that these will incite rebellion like nothing else — a point that those who hope to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions via a carbon tax should bear in mind. --John Authers, The Washington Post, 23 October 2019

Climate activists and the United Nations are suffering a major black eye this week as protests and riots resulting from high energy prices have erupted in Santiago, Chile. Chile, which is hosting a major U.N. climate conference in December, earned praise from climate activists for recently imposing a carbon dioxide tax on conventional energy sources and switching the Santiago Metro system to renewable power. Now, the people of Chile are rising up and firing a shot across the bow of other nations considering similar energy taxes and expensive renewable energy programs. --James Taylor, The Epoch Times, 25 October 2019
    Acknowledgement to GWPF web .  (Global Warming Policy Forum)