Wednesday, 10 February 2016

US Supreme Court blocks Obama`s global warming plans. A fatal blow struck against man made climate change.

The U.S. Supreme Court just delivered a major blow to President Barack Obama’s global warming agenda by halting the implementation of a key Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation on carbon dioxide emissions.
The court won’t allow the EPA to implement its so-called Clean Power Plan (CPP), which aims to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants 32 percent by 2030. This is a big win for the 29 states suing the federal government to stop a rule expected to cripple the coal industry.
“Five justices of the Supreme Court agreed with North Dakota and other parties that EPA’s regulation would impose massive irreparable harms on North Dakota and the rest of the country and that there was a substantial likelihood EPA was acting unlawfully,” Paul Seby, an attorney with law firm Greenberg Traurig representing the state of North Dakota, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.
States asked the Supreme Court to halt implementation of the CPP after a lower court rejected their appeal in January. Now,Attorney General Morrisey and the Obama administration will make their oral arguments on the merits of the law in front of federal judges in June.  " Make no mistake this is a great victory for West Virginia" said the West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey who is leading the 26 states who have filed opposition.  The Obama administration does not have legality on its side. The Paris Agreement on global warming has not been ratified by the Senate. Tom Pyle President of the Institute for Energy Research said "this will be a fatal blow to the president`s climate agenda"

Read more:

Sunday, 7 February 2016

Mind Blowing heat of 1936.


           Fig (1) shows Seymour Indiana which had 49 days over 100 degrees and reached 113F(45celsius)!    Most of the 100 degree days came during two heatwaves.  A 15 day stretch in July and a 20 day stretch in August.   The modern day warmists are liars.  (originally posted by Steven Goddard 7 February 2016)

Wednesday, 20 January 2016

Former IPCC economist says a temperature increase will benefit the earth!

                     Former IPCC economist Richard Tol:   " a global warming of 1.7 degrees celsius would produce net advantages for man and the earth ecosystem" (quote from German magazine Focus)

               Director of the German Johan Heinrich Institute Hans Wegel:  "carbon dioxide is an essential building block of photosynthesis and thus the basis of all life" (quote from German Focus magazine)

.Hot denials (Daily Mail 15 January 2016)
ThE National Oceanic and
atmospheric administration report
that 2015 was the second hottest year
on record (Mail) is untrue.
It depends on terrestrial ground based
temperature data that is
compromised. Data from the UK Met
Office hadley Centre and the
University of East anglia Climatic
Research Unit, Nasa’s Goddard
Institute for Space Studies and the
North Carolina National Climatic Data
Center has been altered to give the
impression the Earth is warming up.
Data found by scientists at the
University of alabama, huntsville,
shows that 1998 and 2010 were warmer
than 2015, which had an average
global temperature of a statistically
insignificant 0.27 deg celsius above
average, largely due to the Pacific El
Nino — a natural occurrence.
Every non-adjusted data set shows
that most of the supposedly hottest
years occurred before the fifties, with
1921, 1931 and 1934 being the three
hottest. as for wet months, UK Met
Office records going back to 1776
show the wettest December in England
and Wales was in 1876 and the
wettest month was October 1903.
as a result of the interference with
ground-based temperature recording
bodies, the Space and Science
Research Corporation (SSRC), a
world leader in climate prediction,
has abandoned these three data sets
and will rely only on University of
alabama and Remote Sensing Systems
satellite measurements, neither of
which shows any global warming.
SSRC has accused the U.S. government
climate bodies, NOaa and Nasa,
and President Obama, of deceiving
the public over the true status of the
earth’s climate. It says: ‘Until scientific
integrity is restored to the White
house and in the rest of the federal
government, we will be forced to rely
solely on satellite data.’
TERRI JACKSON, Bangor, Co. Down

Monday, 11 January 2016

After Paris!

acknowledgement to Viv Forbes(Australia).  Daily Caller opinion poll.
Question:  Is global warming a lie or exaggeration to increase the size of government?   result:  yes  97%  no 3%  .
               Scientists at the University of Alabama Huntsville (UAH) have recorded from satellite measurements(unlike terrestrial temperature data sets satellite measurements cannot be manipulated) and have noted that for 2015 the temperature was 0.27 degrees celsius above the global average.which is within the El Nino range which is a natural occurrence.  The warmest year in the satellite record was 1998.  Both 1998 and 2010 were warmer than 2015.   the 0.27 degrees is statistically insignificant.  The satellite readings are measured from five miles up 24/7 and unlike the terrestrial measurements are not subject to deliberate interference. SSRC(Space and Science Research Corporation) a world leader in climate prediction has accused both the US government climate bodies NOAA and NASA and President Obama of deceiving the public regarding the true status of the earth climate.  Temperature readings have been deliberately lowered before 1998 and raised after 1998 giving a false impression to the public that the earth is warming when the opposite is the case.  Hadcrut 4, Giss and NCDC have been altered to suit the alarmist agenda(fully documented in Professor Plimer`s new book  "Heaven and Hell" now available from Amazon Books).  SSRC have now dropped the US government ground based global temperature data from its list of reliable sources and now only uses UAH and RSS satellite measurements.  SSRC said "until scientific integrity is restored to the White House and in the rest of the federal government we will be forced to rely solely on satellite data" NOAA rewrote the 200 plus year historical temperature dataset to make the last twenty years appear warmer than the past.   Met office statements on the December wet month only go back to 1910(when records were digital).  however as Delingpole has pointed out the Met office records go back to 1776 where the wettest December was in 1876 and the wettest calendar month was October 1903(  this from J Delingpole (Breitbart).  Who is fooling who? Its certainly not Delingpole, Spencer or the Daily Caller!